Digitive engages qualified mental-health professionals for paid, remote medical-AI evaluation work. Use your clinical expertise to help review and improve AI model outputs for accuracy, appropriateness and safety — on flexible hours and in your own language.
Part of the Medical AI Expert Program — one application, reviewed by our team.
Evaluating AI in a sensitive clinical domain needs genuine professional judgement. Mental-health professionals bring reasoning that is directly relevant to assessing whether model outputs are accurate, appropriate and safe. Examples of the expertise that is useful in this work:
Judging whether AI responses reflect the context, nuance and sensitivity expected in real mental-health care.
Spotting where model outputs misuse clinical terminology, frameworks or classifications.
Evaluating whether descriptions of assessment, symptoms or presentations are clinically plausible.
Reviewing the tone, clarity and appropriateness of patient-facing language from a professional standpoint.
Flagging potentially unsafe, misleading or inappropriate output so models can be made safer.
Assessing whether responses are accurate, evidence-informed and appropriate for the context presented.
These are examples of relevant professional expertise, not a description of specific assigned tasks. This page is about evaluating AI outputs — it does not provide patient advice, diagnosis or treatment.
This page covers two distinct groups of mental-health professionals. They have different training, licensing and scopes of practice, and are not interchangeable — each contributes a different kind of professional judgement to AI evaluation. Whether your specific background is a fit is always determined by the Medical AI Expert Program application.
Medically qualified psychiatrists bring a physician's clinical lens — diagnostic reasoning, pharmacological knowledge, risk assessment and management of complex or severe presentations. This perspective is directly relevant to judging whether AI outputs on medication, differential diagnosis and clinical risk are accurate and safe.
Psychologists and allied mental-health professionals bring expertise in assessment, formulation, therapeutic frameworks and patient communication. This perspective is directly relevant to judging whether AI outputs reflect sound psychological reasoning, appropriate tone and safe, non-misleading guidance.
Listing these two areas does not imply equivalent qualifications, licensing or scope of practice, and does not imply that any profession qualifies automatically. The Medical AI Expert Program application remains the authoritative place to check eligibility.
This specialty page is an entry point into Digitive's broader Medical AI Expert Program, which engages licensed and practising medical professionals to review and evaluate AI model outputs for clinical accuracy and safety. The work is written, fully remote and paid, and can be done in your own language.