RLHF & SFT
How we stood up a 150-person annotation team in eight weeks and lifted preference-ranking agreement past 85%.
150+
PhD & Masters annotators
85%+
Inter-annotator agreement
60 d
From kickoff to full scale
4×
Throughput vs. baseline vendor
A frontier AI lab shipping a new flagship model needed to scale their reinforcement-learning-from-human-feedback (RLHF) pipeline from a small in-house team to production-grade throughput ahead of a launch window. Existing crowd-sourced vendors were producing preference data with inter-annotator agreement below 70% — high enough to train a model, low enough to leave real capability gains on the table.

Recruit, vet, and onboard 150+ subject-matter annotators across code, math, safety, and reasoning within 60 days, while holding annotator agreement above 85% and maintaining a full audit trail per response for every preference pair delivered.
Step 1
Sourced 150 vetted specialists from our 2,000+ PhD / Masters network — 40% with published research in ML, reasoning, or applied math
Step 2
Built a domain-tiered annotation pipeline: 4 skill tiers with escalation paths, calibration rounds, and blind gold-set injection at 5% sample rate
Step 3
Deployed dedicated program managers, senior QC leads, and a full governance layer with per-annotator quality dashboards
Step 4
Ran weekly calibration syncs with the client's eval team; re-graded the bottom-quartile annotators every 14 days
150+
PhD & Masters annotators
85%+
Inter-annotator agreement
60 d
From kickoff to full scale
4×
Throughput vs. baseline vendor
Preference-ranking IAA reached 85–89% within the first two calibration cycles. Delivery ramped to 12,000+ ranked pairs per week by day 45. The pipeline is now the client's primary RLHF vendor for their next-generation model, and the engagement has expanded into red-teaming and SFT data generation.
Detailed methodologies, delivery models, staffing tiers, and every case study in one PDF. No sales call required.
18 languages · 400+ native evaluators · 96% on-time
Native-speaker linguistic and cultural evaluation across 18 languages — beyond back-translation, beyond BLEU.
Read case study2,300+ adversarial prompts · 40+ languages · 118 critical findings
Structured adversarial testing across jailbreaks, prompt injection, and policy stress — with severity-ranked findings the safety team could act on.
Read case study900+ eval cases · 70+ specialists · 1 week
How Digitive mobilised 70+ credentialed specialists in under 48 hours to rescue a frontier-model deadline — with 100% completion and 100% on-time submission.
Read case study